Wikipedia Statistics - Edit and Revert Trends: Kuanyama

Saturday July 31, 2010
     
 

Edit history charts for top 50 Wikipedias / ... for all Wikipedias / Edit and revert counts for all Wikipedias

Projects indexed by language / language code / edit countToggle index
Abkhazian, Acehnese, Afar, Afrikaans, Akan, Albanian, Alemannic, All languages, Amharic, Anglo-Saxon, Arabic, Aragonese, Aramaic, Armenian, Aromanian, Arpitan, Assamese, Asturian, Avar, Aymara, Azeri, Bambara, Banyumasan, Bashkir, Basque, Bavarian, Belarusian, Belarusian (Taraškievica), Bengali, Bihari, Bishnupriya Manipuri, Bislama, Bosnian, Breton, Buginese, Bulgarian, Burmese, Buryat, Cantonese, Cassubian, Catalan, Cebuano, Central Bicolano, Chamorro, Chavacano, Chechen, Cherokee, Cheyenne, Chichewa, Chinese, Choctaw, Chuvash, Classical Chinese, Cornish, Corsican, Cree, Crimean Tatar, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Divehi, Dutch, Dutch Low Saxon, Dzongkha, Eastern Mari, Egyptian Arabic, Emilian-Romagnol, English, Erzya, Esperanto, Estonian, Ewe, Extremaduran, Faroese, Fiji Hindi, Fijian, Finnish, French, Frisian, Friulian, Fulfulde, Galician, Gan, Ganda, Georgian, German, Gilaki, Gothic, Greek, Greenlandic, Guarani, Gujarati, Haitian, Hakka, Hausa, Hawai'ian, Hebrew, Herero, Hindi, Hiri Motu, Hungarian, Icelandic, Ido, Igbo, Ilokano, Indonesian, Interlingua, Interlingue, Inuktitut, Inupiak, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kabyle, Kalmyk, Kannada, Kanuri, Kapampangan, Karachay-Balkar, Karakalpak, Kashmiri, Kazakh, Khmer, Kikuyu, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Kirundi, Komi, Kongo, Korean, Kuanyama, Kurdish, Ladino, Lak, Laotian, Latin, Latvian, Ligurian, Limburgish, Lingala, Lithuanian, Lojban, Lombard, Low Saxon, Lower Sorbian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Manx, Maori, Marathi, Marshallese, Mazandarani, Min Dong, Min Nan, Mirandese, Moksha, Moldavian, Mongolian, Muskogee, Nahuatl, Nauruan, Navajo, Ndonga, Neapolitan, Nepal Bhasa, Nepali, Norfolk, Norman, Northern Sami, Norwegian, Novial, Nynorsk, Occitan, Old Church Slavonic, Oriya, Oromo, Ossetic, Pali, Pangasinan, Papiamentu, Pashto, Pennsylvania German, Persian, Picard, Piedmontese, Polish, Pontic, Portuguese, Punjabi, Quechua, Ripuarian, Romani, Romanian, Romansh, Russian, Sakha, Samoan, Samogitian, Sangro, Sanskrit, Sardinian, Saterland Frisian, Scots, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Serbo-Croatian, Sesotho, Setswana, Shona, Sicilian, Silesian, Simple English, Sindhi, Sinhala, Siswati, Slovak, Slovene, Somali, Sorani, Spanish, Sranan, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tagalog, Tahitian, Tajik, Tamil, Tarantino, Tatar, Telugu, Tetum, Thai, Tibetan, Tigrinya, Tok Pisin, Tongan, Tsonga, Tumbuka, Turkish, Turkmen, Twi, Udmurt, Ukrainian, Upper Sorbian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Venda, Venetian, Vietnamese, Volapük, Voro, Walloon, Waray-Waray, Welsh, West Flemish, Western Panjabi, Wolof, Wu, Xhosa, Yi, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zazaki, Zealandic, Zhuang, Zulu

Monthly trend in number of edits

Also shown is monthly trend for total reverts, for scale comparison

Chart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)

Plot Edits   Plot Edits


Monthly trend in revert activity, relative to edit volume

Per x edits, were anonymous edits reverted more often than edits by bots or by registered users?

Chart shows ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Note: often peaks in revert ratio in early years are not so significant as in later years:
low absolute edit counts easily led to high fluctuations in revert ratio.

Plot Reverts   Plot Reverts

Revert ratio is ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Only reverts detected by md5 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.

Reverts is less than reverted edits! Sometimes several edits are undone with one revert.
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:89%, >5 edits:11%

When several revisions were reverted in one action, the oldest reverted revision determines editor class (and coloring):
is this a reverted user edit (reg/anon) or a reverted bot edit?


Distribution of reverts

Breakdown per namespace, type of reverted editor (registered or anonymous user or bot), type of reverter (same), was it a self revert or not, per time period.
Note: a high percentage in any segment can relate to a high absolute number of edits for that segment, or a high revert ratio, or both (please consult charts above for context)
.Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

 Distribution of reverts, each subdivision adds up to 100%
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles81.8%Reg user33.3%Reg user100.0%Self33.3%
Others66.7%
Anon user0.0%
Bot0.0%
Anon user44.4%Reg user100.0%
Anon user0.0%Self-%
Others-%
Bot0.0%
Bot0.0%Reg user-%
Anon user-%
Bot-%Self-%
Others-%
Unknown22.2%Reg User100.0%
Anon User0.0%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages
18.2%Reg user0.0%
Anon user100.0%
Bot0.0%
Unknown0.0%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, each percentage is share of total reverts
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles81.8%Reg user27.3%Reg user27.3%Self9.1%
Others18.2%
Anon user0.0%
Bot0.0%
Anon user36.4%Reg user36.4%
Anon user0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Bot0.0%
Bot0.0%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Unknown18.2%Reg User18.2%
Anon User0.0%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages
18.2%Reg user0.0%
Anon user18.2%
Bot0.0%
Unknown0.0%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, per year and type
20092007200620052004
-20.0%---
100.0%20.0%---
-----
-----
-40.0%100.0%33.3%-
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-20.0%--100.0%
-----
-----
-----
---66.7%-
-----
-----
 totals reverts per year
15131
   

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are share
 of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
 Reg user42.9%Reg user42.9%Self14.3%
Others28.6%
Anon user0.0%
Bot0.0%
Anon user57.1%Reg user57.1%
Anon user0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Bot0.0%
Bot0.0%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are
 share of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
20092007200620052004
-25.0%---
100.0%25.0%---
-----
-----
-50.0%100.0%100.0%-
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
-----
 totals reverts per year
1411 

Top Rankings

UsersContent
 Most Active Reverters  Most Reverted Editors  Most Reverted Articles  Most Reverted Other Non-Project Pages 
# Rv User/Bot # Rv User/Bot # Rv Article # RvPage
2Neko1220.239.71.525Main Page2Talk:Main Page
2Johannes Rohr185.108.98.1671Omwedi 
1Thogo124.238.95.1321Omafimbo odula 
1Btw1Neko  
1Pathoschild1193.111.93.130  
 1SallyJ  
 1Johannes Rohr  
Bot names are in dark red 
#Rv is revert actions, not reverted revisions (sometimes a revert action undoes several revisions).
Only reverts detected by md5 match are considered here, not (partial) reverts only detectable via comments.
Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

Generated on Wednesday August 4, 2010 from recent database dump files.
Data processed up to Saturday July 31, 2010
Please note that the lengthy dump process (many weeks) means a delay in publishing these statistics is always to be expected.

Script version:2.5
Author:Erik Zachte (Web site)
Mail:ezachte@### (no spam: ### = wikimedia.org)
For documentation see meta
Scripts: scripts.zip

Charts rendered with R

All data and images on this page are in the public domain.