Wikipedia Statistics - Edit and Revert Trends: Chichewa

Saturday July 31, 2010
     
 

Edit history charts for top 50 Wikipedias / ... for all Wikipedias / Edit and revert counts for all Wikipedias

Projects indexed by language / language code / edit countToggle index
Abkhazian, Acehnese, Afar, Afrikaans, Akan, Albanian, Alemannic, All languages, Amharic, Anglo-Saxon, Arabic, Aragonese, Aramaic, Armenian, Aromanian, Arpitan, Assamese, Asturian, Avar, Aymara, Azeri, Bambara, Banyumasan, Bashkir, Basque, Bavarian, Belarusian, Belarusian (Taraškievica), Bengali, Bihari, Bishnupriya Manipuri, Bislama, Bosnian, Breton, Buginese, Bulgarian, Burmese, Buryat, Cantonese, Cassubian, Catalan, Cebuano, Central Bicolano, Chamorro, Chavacano, Chechen, Cherokee, Cheyenne, Chichewa, Chinese, Choctaw, Chuvash, Classical Chinese, Cornish, Corsican, Cree, Crimean Tatar, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Divehi, Dutch, Dutch Low Saxon, Dzongkha, Eastern Mari, Egyptian Arabic, Emilian-Romagnol, English, Erzya, Esperanto, Estonian, Ewe, Extremaduran, Faroese, Fiji Hindi, Fijian, Finnish, French, Frisian, Friulian, Fulfulde, Galician, Gan, Ganda, Georgian, German, Gilaki, Gothic, Greek, Greenlandic, Guarani, Gujarati, Haitian, Hakka, Hausa, Hawai'ian, Hebrew, Herero, Hindi, Hiri Motu, Hungarian, Icelandic, Ido, Igbo, Ilokano, Indonesian, Interlingua, Interlingue, Inuktitut, Inupiak, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Javanese, Kabyle, Kalmyk, Kannada, Kanuri, Kapampangan, Karachay-Balkar, Karakalpak, Kashmiri, Kazakh, Khmer, Kikuyu, Kinyarwanda, Kirghiz, Kirundi, Komi, Kongo, Korean, Kuanyama, Kurdish, Ladino, Lak, Laotian, Latin, Latvian, Ligurian, Limburgish, Lingala, Lithuanian, Lojban, Lombard, Low Saxon, Lower Sorbian, Luxembourgish, Macedonian, Malagasy, Malay, Malayalam, Maltese, Manx, Maori, Marathi, Marshallese, Mazandarani, Min Dong, Min Nan, Mirandese, Moksha, Moldavian, Mongolian, Muskogee, Nahuatl, Nauruan, Navajo, Ndonga, Neapolitan, Nepal Bhasa, Nepali, Norfolk, Norman, Northern Sami, Norwegian, Novial, Nynorsk, Occitan, Old Church Slavonic, Oriya, Oromo, Ossetic, Pali, Pangasinan, Papiamentu, Pashto, Pennsylvania German, Persian, Picard, Piedmontese, Polish, Pontic, Portuguese, Punjabi, Quechua, Ripuarian, Romani, Romanian, Romansh, Russian, Sakha, Samoan, Samogitian, Sangro, Sanskrit, Sardinian, Saterland Frisian, Scots, Scots Gaelic, Serbian, Serbo-Croatian, Sesotho, Setswana, Shona, Sicilian, Silesian, Simple English, Sindhi, Sinhala, Siswati, Slovak, Slovene, Somali, Sorani, Spanish, Sranan, Sundanese, Swahili, Swedish, Tagalog, Tahitian, Tajik, Tamil, Tarantino, Tatar, Telugu, Tetum, Thai, Tibetan, Tigrinya, Tok Pisin, Tongan, Tsonga, Tumbuka, Turkish, Turkmen, Twi, Udmurt, Ukrainian, Upper Sorbian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Venda, Venetian, Vietnamese, Volapük, Voro, Walloon, Waray-Waray, Welsh, West Flemish, Western Panjabi, Wolof, Wu, Xhosa, Yi, Yiddish, Yoruba, Zazaki, Zealandic, Zhuang, Zulu

Monthly trend in number of edits

Also shown is monthly trend for total reverts, for scale comparison

Chart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)

Plot Edits   Plot Edits


Monthly trend in revert activity, relative to edit volume

Per x edits, were anonymous edits reverted more often than edits by bots or by registered users?

Chart shows ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Note: often peaks in revert ratio in early years are not so significant as in later years:
low absolute edit counts easily led to high fluctuations in revert ratio.

Plot Reverts   Plot Reverts

Revert ratio is ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Only reverts detected by md5 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.

Reverts is less than reverted edits! Sometimes several edits are undone with one revert.
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:89%, 2 edits:5%, 3 edits:3%, 4 edits:3%, >5 edits:0%

When several revisions were reverted in one action, the oldest reverted revision determines editor class (and coloring):
is this a reverted user edit (reg/anon) or a reverted bot edit?


Monthly trend in revert activity towards anonymous edits

Are anonymous edits reverted often, and if so, by what type of reverter?

Chart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)
Note: for many (not all) larger projects the not reverted edits show less seasonal fluctuation than the reverted edits

Plot Anons   Plot Anons

'All anonymous edits' is same red line from first chart, scaled up vertically
Put succinctly: red - black = blue + brown + green
Only reverts detected by md5 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.

Percentages are an approximation, as two simplifying assumptions have been made:
1) Anonymous edits are reverted only once (in other words edit wars on anon edits are not taken into account).
2) On each revert only one anonymous edit was undone. A frequency count of multiple revision reverts shows this is a simplification:
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:89%, 2 edits:5%, 3 edits:3%, 4 edits:3%, >5 edits:0%


Distribution of reverts

Breakdown per namespace, type of reverted editor (registered or anonymous user or bot), type of reverter (same), was it a self revert or not, per time period.
Note: a high percentage in any segment can relate to a high absolute number of edits for that segment, or a high revert ratio, or both (please consult charts above for context)
.Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

 Distribution of reverts, each subdivision adds up to 100%
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles71.2%Reg user7.0%Reg user75.0%Self0.0%
Others100.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot25.0%
Anon user40.4%Reg user87.0%
Anon user13.0%Self33.3%
Others66.7%
Bot0.0%
Bot47.4%Reg user14.8%
Anon user3.7%
Bot81.5%Self45.5%
Others54.5%
Unknown5.3%Reg User66.7%
Anon User33.3%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages
28.8%Reg user4.3%
Anon user39.1%
Bot39.1%
Unknown17.4%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, each percentage is share of total reverts
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles71.2%Reg user5.0%Reg user3.8%Self0.0%
Others3.8%
Anon user0.0%
Bot1.2%
Anon user28.8%Reg user25.0%
Anon user3.8%Self1.2%
Others2.5%
Bot0.0%
Bot33.8%Reg user5.0%
Anon user1.2%
Bot27.5%Self12.5%
Others15.0%
Unknown3.8%Reg User2.5%
Anon User1.2%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages
28.8%Reg user1.2%
Anon user11.2%
Bot11.2%
Unknown5.0%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, per year and type
201020092008200720062005
------
--33.3%7.1%--
------
-5.9%----
16.7%17.6%-50.0%35.7%20.0%
--16.7%---
----14.3%-
------
-17.6%-7.1%--
-5.9%----
20.8%17.6%16.7%7.1%--
25.0%23.5%33.3%---
4.2%---7.1%-
-5.9%----
------
---7.1%--
---7.1%35.7%60.0%
33.3%5.9%----
---14.3%7.1%20.0%
 totals reverts per year
2417614145
   

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are share
 of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
 Reg user7.4%Reg user5.6%Self0.0%
Others5.6%
Anon user0.0%
Bot1.9%
Anon user42.6%Reg user37.0%
Anon user5.6%Self1.9%
Others3.7%
Bot0.0%
Bot50.0%Reg user7.4%
Anon user1.9%
Bot40.7%Self18.5%
Others22.2%
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are
 share of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
201020092008200720062005
------
--33.3%10.0%--
------
-6.7%----
26.7%20.0%-70.0%71.4%100.0%
--16.7%---
----28.6%-
------
-20.0%-10.0%--
-6.7%----
33.3%20.0%16.7%10.0%--
40.0%26.7%33.3%---
 totals reverts per year
151561071

Top Rankings

UsersContent
 Most Active Reverters  Most Reverted Editors  Most Reverted Articles  Most Reverted Other Non-Project Pages 
# Rv User/Bot # Rv User/Bot # Rv Article # RvPage
14Lycaon10Xqbot8Tsamba Lalikulu6Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
7Xqbot3JAnDbot7True Jesus Church4User:Angela
4JAnDbot2SieBot5Zambia4Talk:Tsamba Lalikulu
3VolkovBot262.145.37.263Chingerezi2Category:Africa
2Jorunn266.36.203.2422Yesu Kristu1User:Jose77
2Korg2VolkovBot2Malawi Congress Party1Template:Delete
2SieBot2Thijs!bot2Africa1User:Hégésippe Cormier
2JhsBot2Robbot2Baibulo 
2ArthurBot1Obersachsebot2South Africa 
1Mav185.108.98.1672David Banda 
1Synthebot1Samuel962Zomera 
1J.delanoy1218.250.108.1232Dedza 
1Cometstyles1Alepha1John Tembo 
184.197.157.1071221.159.49.121ISO 3166-1 
1Jon Harald Søby1195.5.116.2461Mulungu dalitsa Malaŵi 
1Djsasso185.57.200.781Lithuania 
1TXiKiBoT1118.96.135.1121Stand and Sing of Zambia%2C Proud and Free 
1Kanabekobaton1216.73.77.2361Asia 
1Hercule1190.67.59.121Balaka 
1Tiyoringo188.131.32.21Pigazzano 
1Mercy1151.48.99.1011North West (South Africa) 
159.136.72.1491201.224.142.11Malaŵi 
1Thijs!bot1CommonsDelinker1Lilongwe 
190.176.233.1221Luckas-bot1Tanzania 
182.170.1.2481Jotterbot1Mlungu dalitsani Malaŵi 
 161.68.189.1721Boma 
 181.177.14.261Gwanda Chakuamba 
 1AlleborgoBot  
 1217.74.47.3  
 1SassoBot  
 1Budelberger  
 1Tiyoringo  
 188.240.98.230  
 124.58.254.242  
 1220.239.71.52  
 182.92.85.162  
 159.136.72.149  
Bot names are in dark red 
#Rv is revert actions, not reverted revisions (sometimes a revert action undoes several revisions).
Only reverts detected by md5 match are considered here, not (partial) reverts only detectable via comments.
Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

Generated on Wednesday August 4, 2010 from recent database dump files.
Data processed up to Saturday July 31, 2010
Please note that the lengthy dump process (many weeks) means a delay in publishing these statistics is always to be expected.

Script version:2.5
Author:Erik Zachte (Web site)
Mail:ezachte@### (no spam: ### = wikimedia.org)
For documentation see meta
Scripts: scripts.zip

Charts rendered with R

All data and images on this page are in the public domain.