Wikiquote Statistics - Edit and Revert Trends: Wolof

Thursday December 31, 2015
     
 
Edit history charts for top 50 Wikiquotes / ... for all Wikiquotes / Edit and revert counts for all Wikiquotes

Projects indexed by language / language code / edit countToggle index
Afrikaans, Albanian, Alemannic, All languages, Amharic, Anglo-Saxon, Arabic, Armenian, Asturian, Azeri, Bambara, Basque, Belarusian, Bosnian, Breton, Bulgarian, Catalan, Chinese, Cornish, Corsican, Croatian, Czech, Danish, Dutch, English, Esperanto, Estonian, Finnish, French, Galician, Georgian, German, Greek, Gujarati, Hebrew, Hindi, Hungarian, Icelandic, Indonesian, Irish, Italian, Japanese, Kannada, Kanuri, Kashmiri, Kazakh, Kirghiz, Korean, Kurdish, Latin, Limburgish, Lithuanian, Low Saxon, Luxembourgish, Malayalam, Marathi, Min Nan, Nauruan, Norwegian, Nynorsk, Persian, Polish, Portuguese, Quechua, Romanian, Russian, Sanskrit, Serbian, Simple English, Slovak, Slovene, Spanish, Sundanese, Swedish, Tamil, Tatar, Telugu, Thai, Tokipona, Turkish, Turkmen, Ukrainian, Urdu, Uyghur, Uzbek, Vietnamese, Volapük, Welsh, Wolof, Zhuang

Monthly trend in number of edits

Also shown is monthly trend for total reverts, for scale comparison

Chart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)

Plot Edits   Plot Edits

Monthly trend in revert activity, relative to edit volume

Per x edits, were anonymous edits reverted more often than edits by bots or by registered users?

Chart shows ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Note: often peaks in revert ratio in early years are not so significant as in later years:
low absolute edit counts easily led to high fluctuations in revert ratio.

Plot Reverts   Plot Reverts

Revert ratio is ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Only reverts detected by sha1 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.

Reverts is less than reverted edits! Sometimes several edits are undone with one revert.
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:18%, 2 edits:18%, 3 edits:9%, 5 edits:36%, >5 edits:18%

When several revisions were reverted in one action, the oldest reverted revision determines editor class (and coloring):
is this a reverted user edit (reg/anon) or a reverted bot edit?

Distribution of reverts

Breakdown per namespace, type of reverted editor (registered or anonymous user or bot), type of reverter (same), was it a self revert or not, per time period.
Note: a high percentage in any segment can relate to a high absolute number of edits for that segment, or a high revert ratio, or both (please consult charts above for context)
.Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

 Distribution of reverts, each subdivision adds up to 100%
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles61.5%Reg user75.0%Reg user83.3%Self0.0%
Others100.0%
Anon user16.7%
Bot0.0%
Anon user0.0%Reg user-%
Anon user-%Self-%
Others-%
Bot-%
Bot12.5%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot100.0%Self0.0%
Others100.0%
Unknown12.5%Reg User100.0%
Anon User0.0%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages		38.5%Reg user40.0%
Anon user40.0%
Bot0.0%
Unknown20.0%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no sha1 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, each percentage is share of total reverts
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
Articles61.5%Reg user46.2%Reg user38.5%Self0.0%
Others38.5%
Anon user7.7%
Bot0.0%
Anon user0.0%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Bot0.0%
Bot7.7%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot7.7%Self0.0%
Others7.7%
Unknown7.7%Reg User7.7%
Anon User0.0%
Bot0.0%
Other
Non-
Project
Pages		38.5%Reg user15.4%
Anon user15.4%
Bot0.0%
Unknown7.7%
Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no sha1 match
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  
 Distribution of reverts, per year and type
2014201320122007
----
---62.5%
---12.5%
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
50.0%---
---12.5%
----
----
50.0%100.0%--
--100.0%-
----
---12.5%
 totals reverts per year
2128
   

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are share
 of sha1 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
Namespace(s)Reverted editorRevert bySelf revert
 Reg user85.7%Reg user71.4%Self0.0%
Others71.4%
Anon user14.3%
Bot0.0%
Anon user0.0%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%Self0.0%
Others0.0%
Bot0.0%
Bot14.3%Reg user0.0%
Anon user0.0%
Bot14.3%Self0.0%
Others14.3%
Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous
  

 Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are
 share of sha1 detected reverts only, for article namespace only
2014201320122007
----
---83.3%
---16.7%
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
----
100.0%---
 totals reverts per year
1  6

Top Rankings

UsersContent
 Most Active Reverters  Most Reverted Editors  Most Reverted Articles  Most Reverted Other Non-Project Pages 
# Rv User/Bot # Rv User/Bot # Rv Article # RvPage
2DerHexer2SF-Language6Xët wu njëkk2User:Moe Epsilon
184.28.2.1082Guérin Nicolas1C. S. Lewis1User:-revi
1SamoaBot1Sir Nicholas de Lenfent Bot 1User:Pratyya Ghosh/common.js
1Drini1SPQRobin  
1SF-Language1MF-Warburg  
1Jorunn   
Bot names are in dark red 
#Rv is revert actions, not reverted revisions (sometimes a revert action undoes several revisions).
Only reverts detected by sha1 match are considered here, not (partial) reverts only detectable via comments.
Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process

Wikiquotes are ordered by hourly page views in recent days
Generated on Thursday January 21, 2016 21:18 from recent database dump files.
Data processed up to Thursday December 31, 2015

Please note that the lengthy dump process (many weeks) means a delay in publishing these statistics is always to be expected.

Author:Erik Zachte (Web site)
Mail:ezachte@### (no spam: ### = wikimedia.org)
Documentation / Scripts / CSV files: About WikiStats

Charts rendered with R

All data and images on this page are in the public domain.