Wikinews Statistics - Edit and Revert Trends: SindhiWednesday June 30, 2010 |
|
| |
Edit history charts for top 50 Wikinews sites
/ ... for all Wikinews sites / Edit and revert counts for all Wikinews sites
| Projects indexed by language / language code / edit count | Toggle index |
|
All languages, Arabic, Bosnian, Bulgarian, Catalan, Chinese, Czech, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Hebrew, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Norwegian, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Serbian, Sindhi, Spanish, Swedish, Tamil, Thai, Turkish, Ukrainian
ar, bg, bs, ca, cs, de, en, es, fi, fr, he, hu, it, ja, nl, no, pl, pt, ro, ru, sd, sr, sv, ta, th, tr, uk, zh, zz
All languages, English (358 k), German (176 k), French (86 k), Italian (66 k), Polish (55 k), Spanish (61 k), Portuguese (45 k), Japanese (26 k), Chinese (20 k), Serbian (474 k), Swedish (12 k), Russian (9 k), Dutch (9 k), Turkish (6 k), Finnish (6 k), Hebrew (5 k), Hungarian (5 k), Romanian (5 k), Arabic (5 k), Czech (4 k), Norwegian (4 k), Tamil (2 k), Catalan (2 k), Sindhi (2 k), Bulgarian (2 k), Ukrainian (2 k), Bosnian (893), Thai (429)
|
Monthly trend in number of edits
Also shown is monthly trend for total reverts, for scale comparisonChart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)
Monthly trend in revert activity, relative to edit volume
Per x edits, were anonymous edits reverted more often than edits by bots or by registered users?Chart shows ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Note: often peaks in revert ratio in early years are not so significant as in later years:
low absolute edit counts easily led to high fluctuations in revert ratio.
Revert ratio is ratio reverts:edits per class of editors (registered or anonymous users or bots).
Only reverts detected by md5 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.
Reverts is less than reverted edits! Sometimes several edits are undone with one revert.
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:71%, 2 edits:14%, 3 edits:5%, 4 edits:1%, 5 edits:3%, >5 edits:5%
When several revisions were reverted in one action, the oldest reverted revision determines editor class (and coloring):
is this a reverted user edit (reg/anon) or a reverted bot edit?
Monthly trend in revert activity towards anonymous edits
Are anonymous edits reverted often, and if so, by what type of reverter?Chart shows absolute numbers (y axis scale shows number of edits relative (%) to busiest month)
Note: for many (not all) larger projects the not reverted edits show less seasonal fluctuation than the reverted edits
'All anonymous edits' is same red line from first chart, scaled up vertically
Put succinctly: red - black = blue + brown + green
Only reverts detected by md5 matching are considered here, not (partial) manual reverts only detectable by edit comment.
Percentages are an approximation, as two simplifying assumptions have been made:
1) Anonymous edits are reverted only once (in other words edit wars on anon edits are not taken into account).
2) On each revert only one anonymous edit was undone. A frequency count of multiple revision reverts shows this is a simplification:
Reverts broken down by number of reverted edits: 1 edit:71%, 2 edits:14%, 3 edits:5%, 4 edits:1%, 5 edits:3%, >5 edits:5%
Distribution of reverts
Breakdown per namespace, type of reverted editor (registered or anonymous user or bot), type of reverter (same), was it a self revert or not, per time period.
Note: a high percentage in any segment can relate to a high absolute number of edits for that segment, or a high revert ratio, or both (please consult charts above for context)
.Projects pages are excluded due to enormous amount of false positives: some status pages are cleared often as normal process
| Distribution of reverts, each subdivision adds up to 100% |
|---|
| Namespace(s) | Reverted editor | Revert by | Self revert |
|---|
| Articles | 26.0% | Reg user | 60.0% | Reg user | 83.3% | Self | 90.0% |
| Others | 10.0% |
| Anon user | 16.7% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Anon user | 40.0% | Reg user | 62.5% |
| Anon user | 37.5% | Self | 0.0% |
| Others | 100.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% | Reg user | -% |
| Anon user | -% |
| Bot | -% | Self | -% |
| Others | -% |
| Unknown | 0.0% | Reg User | -% |
| Anon User | -% |
| Bot | -% |
Other
Non-
Project
Pages | 74.0% | Reg user | 98.2% |
| Anon user | 1.8% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 0.0% |
| Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match |
| Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous |
| |
| Distribution of reverts, each percentage is share of total reverts |
|---|
| Namespace(s) | Reverted editor | Revert by | Self revert |
|---|
| Articles | 26.0% | Reg user | 15.6% | Reg user | 13.0% | Self | 11.7% |
| Others | 1.3% |
| Anon user | 2.6% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Anon user | 10.4% | Reg user | 6.5% |
| Anon user | 3.9% | Self | 0.0% |
| Others | 3.9% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% | Reg user | 0.0% |
| Anon user | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% | Self | 0.0% |
| Others | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 0.0% | Reg User | 0.0% |
| Anon User | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
Other
Non-
Project
Pages | 74.0% | Reg user | 72.7% |
| Anon user | 1.3% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Unknown | 0.0% |
| Unknown = comments mentions (partial) revert, but no md5 match |
| Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous |
| |
| Distribution of reverts, per year and type |
|---|
| 2010 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|
| - | - | 12.7% |
| - | - | 1.4% |
| - | - | 2.8% |
| - | - | - |
| 100.0% | - | 5.6% |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | 4.2% |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | 100.0% | 71.8% |
| - | - | 1.4% |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| totals reverts per year |
|---|
| 1 | 5 | 71 |
|
| | |
Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are share
of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only |
|---|
| Namespace(s) | Reverted editor | Revert by | Self revert |
|---|
| | Reg user | 60.0% | Reg user | 50.0% | Self | 45.0% |
| Others | 5.0% |
| Anon user | 10.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Anon user | 40.0% | Reg user | 25.0% |
| Anon user | 15.0% | Self | 0.0% |
| Others | 15.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% | Reg user | 0.0% |
| Anon user | 0.0% |
| Bot | 0.0% | Self | 0.0% |
| Others | 0.0% |
| Reg = registered, Anon = anonymous |
| |
Distribution of reverts, like table above, but percentages are
share of md5 detected reverts only, for article namespace only |
|---|
| 2010 | 2007 | 2006 |
|---|
| - | - | 47.4% |
| - | - | 5.3% |
| - | - | 10.5% |
| - | - | - |
| 100.0% | - | 21.1% |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | 15.8% |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| - | - | - |
| totals reverts per year |
|---|
| 1 | | 19 |
|
Top Rankings
Generated on Saturday July 31, 2010 from recent database dump files.
Data processed up to Wednesday June 30, 2010
Please note that the lengthy dump process (many weeks) means a delay in publishing these statistics is always to be expected.
Script version:2.5
Author:Erik Zachte (Web site)
Mail:ezachte@### (no spam: ### = wikimedia.org)
For documentation see meta
Scripts: scripts.zip
Charts rendered with R
All data and images on this page are in the public domain.